- #Chronosync sync over internet full
- #Chronosync sync over internet Offline
- #Chronosync sync over internet mac
#Chronosync sync over internet full
For instance, I have opted for higher CPU consumption but full deduplication, encryption and compression to minimize my actual uploads. Crashplan speed is influenced heavily by the settings you choose. Very happy Crashplan user here (and former Mozy one). I really just need to get to a system that on a daily basis updates an offsite backup in case of theft or fire. I clone my desktop's HD to an external drive with SuperDuper! weekly. All computers use TimeMachine to backup to a RAID5 array on my desktop. I have a Drobo at home, the new 5D, so I'm just moving things onto it. I have a reasonable (I think) backup system already.
#Chronosync sync over internet Offline
This is really my emergency offline storage approach.
#Chronosync sync over internet mac
I could run ChronoSync on the Mac in my office and ChronoAgent on each of my Macs to be backed up, as far as I can tell.īoth Arq and ChronoSync seem to differ from CrashPlan in that their agents do not seem to run as root, and so only the logged-in user(s) are getting backed up, while I presently have CrashPlan running for all users on my desktop system.but that's not a huge problem as pretty much each computer is used 95% by only one user anyway. Again, I think, because the documentation is a bit hard to interpret. With ChronoAgent, you can do internet based backups. I think you can configure backups to be encrypted. Amazon storage means I don't have to worry about maintaining my own off-site storage location, but if I ever do need to restore from the offsite backup, I'll be waiting a good long time.ĬhronoSync isn't a bad choice either.
Storage is in Amazon, and now that Glacier is supported, the cost is reasonable for the 1.5TB that I would archive. The two other choices I've been looking at are Arq and ChronoSync.Īrq is a per-computer cost backups are encrypted. If it weren't for my perception that Java is slowing down my desktop (it's a problem when you can see a Finder window updating on a machine this powerful!) I probably wouldn't switch. As a paid subscriber, I get an unlimited number of computers backing up. In any case, CrashPlan does pretty much what I am looking for: it provides me with the ability to have an offsite backup, with the remote backup encrypted and yet still under my control, because the remote backup is stored on an drive in my office, to provide backups for all of my home computers.
(Of course, if someone else has an explanation for why my i7-based 27" iMac has taken to running so slowly, I am open to suggestion.) My main motivation for changing is that it seems that Java eats a lot of processor, and CrashPlan is written in Java.so I was looking for alternatives. My specific goal is to establish my off-site backup strategy, or perhaps I should say reestablish, as I have been a happy CrashPlan customer for a while now.
0 kommentar(er)
